It is currently Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:29 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1528 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 ... 77  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 15, 2015 8:09 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 6994
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
Sir Finley Mrrgglton

Hooray! Thanks!

On a similar note, any chance we could also get [hs=Bash]this sort of functionality[/hs]?

_________________
0x10


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 19, 2015 12:07 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
I tried to do a search for "18 - 24", but the search came back invalid because it consisted entirely of common words. Is there a way to get it to search as if "18 - 24" were one (uncommon) word.

The following words in your search query were ignored because they are too common words: 18 24.
You must specify at least one word to search for. Each word must consist of at least 3 characters and must not contain more than 14 characters excluding wildcards.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2015 1:46 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
The results page for "random card" on card search should have a random card button on it so you can just random cards continuously.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:05 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Feb 21, 2014
Posts: 2334
So I see we have colorless mana now.

However the colorless mana symbol lacks the same drop shadow sort of effect that other mana symbols have, which leads to it looking weird. Also, the black is a little bit too sharp and black in the symbol. I know it was probably made from scratch or something, so I don't really blame you, but still.

Compare:


_________________
Dwarven Vow #7


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:41 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
don't all look the same either. Nice to see we're on the ball with though. It's : C : by the way.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 1:59 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 4439
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
Can we please get the option to perma-delete our soft-deleted posts?

_________________


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:01 am 
Offline
Moderator Lead
User avatar

Joined: Jun 05, 2015
Posts: 980
Identity: Male
The soft-delete feature is important for the moderation staff, because with a hard delete the data is gone, which means we can't respond to problem behaviors if they're deleted before we see it. If non-moderator users can only soft delete, we always have a visible trail, and trolls can't cover their tracks by making a post, upsetting people, then deleting it before any of us catch it.

An in-between feature that lets you hide your soft-deleted posts from your own view without actually fully deleting them could be reasonable, but I can't speak for Welder as to how difficult that may be to implement.

_________________
I ask for so little. Just let me rule you, and you can have everything that you want. Just fear me, love me, do as I say, and I will be your slave.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2016 9:26 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 4439
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
I really just want soft-deleted posts not to count towards the thread's postcount, because it disrupts my ability to snipe the top post of the next page in my threads.

_________________


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:29 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5541
Location: Inside my own head
Identity: Human
How difficult would it be to implement some sort of in-site linking ability? What I mean is something like [forums]viewtopic.php?f=31&t=2178[/forums] would direct to viewtopic.php?f=31&t=2178

I know, having needed to look up HTML coding for footnotes, that such a thing is possible to just do in-code, but is there a simple way to allow us posters to do that and cut down on link character counts for index threads?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 2:19 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
Could the card search be updated with an option to search flavour text.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:32 pm 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
If you click on the big No Goblins Allowed in the upper left of the front page, it should probably take you to the forums. There's no point in having it redirect you to the page you are already on.
The wiki still uses the old NGA logo.

I hope you apreciate that I am doing my due diligence and finding work for you.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:34 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
There should be a random card button on the NGA Constructed card pages. That way, you don't have to go back to the main card search page to do another random search.
It is awesome though that you can already choose a set then hit random card to get a random card from within that set. This also works when searching by other criteria. Sadly though, choosing multiple colours seems to confuse the system and returns monocolour cards.

Music note smilie?

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 10:38 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '11
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10074
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/my/mine/himself
Is there any way to filter by tags? It seems to be excluded from thread titles when making searches on them, which makes me wonder why they exist in the first place.

_________________
In the custody of febb since 12.05.16
[Warchief] Custom EDH Project

you're like the kind of person who would cast Necropotence irl


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 08, 2016 1:15 pm 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
Mown wrote:
Is there any way to filter by tags? It seems to be excluded from thread titles when making searches on them, which makes me wonder why they exist in the first place.

That is a good point. I suppose they're still a quick way to identify threads, but tags are usually intended to be searchable.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2016 1:32 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 12517
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
I can't search the NGA gatherer for the Case cards from Velicita.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 10:59 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 13477
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
Elevate wrote:
i vote that former ymtc champions have there user titles updated to reflect their win
:shifty:


can we do this? also Mown mentioned Idol as well, although Idol has never really run on these boards so I could see the argument against it, especially 'cause it starts to get crowded. but like I can get you a list of former Champs winners pretty easily if this is a thing we can do.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

The BLOCK I'm currently pretending I'll finish: Fleets Of Ossia (complete!) | Wavebreak (complete!) | The Second Flood (in progress!)
Razorborne and friends teach music theory to chumps like you: 12tone


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:22 pm 
Offline
Development Lead
User avatar

Joined: Sep 19, 2013
Posts: 1527
Sure, that should be fine.

_________________
"In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded." — Terry Pratchett


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 12:30 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 13477
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
  • Dream Spinner, 2005 (account: DS)
  • tyranno6, 2006 (account: ty)
  • Pegaweb, 2007 (doesn't have an account)
  • Riorvard, 2008
  • Detektor, 2009
  • Elevate, 2010
  • Mown, 2011
  • Rush_Clasic, 2012
  • Gleemax, 2013 (Wizards blew up the forums and we never ran one this year)
  • razorborne, 2014 (that's me!)

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

The BLOCK I'm currently pretending I'll finish: Fleets Of Ossia (complete!) | Wavebreak (complete!) | The Second Flood (in progress!)
Razorborne and friends teach music theory to chumps like you: 12tone


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:56 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5541
Location: Inside my own head
Identity: Human
razorborne wrote:
  • Dream Spinner, 2005 (account: DS)
  • tyranno6, 2006 (account: ty)
  • Pegaweb, 2007 (doesn't have an account)
  • Riorvard, 2008
  • Detektor, 2009
  • Elevate, 2010
  • Mown, 2011
  • Rush_Clasic, 2012
  • Gleemax, 2013 (Wizards blew up the forums and we never ran one this year)
  • razorborne, 2014 (that's me!)

:duel:

So who was the champ last year?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:58 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Posts: 2441
Location: California
Identity: Rubik
We don't have champions anymore. Not after Razorborne.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1528 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75 ... 77  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group