Go ahead. Prove I broke our treaty if you can. You can't, but I dare you to try.

You aren't a member. You weren't even privy to the negotiations in which a "member" was defined, so I'm not sure how you could claim to even know what a "member" was. If we were even to consider you a "signatory"—as in someone who "signed" the deal—that's wholely irrelevant, on account of the fact that Rag and I clearly deemed the members to be her and me and our faction mates. You are not Rag, you are not me, and you do not share a faction with either of us. Ergo, you are not a "member". That logic is irrefutable, but even if you were to somehow refute it, that still wouldn't matter, because a deal entered into under bad faith is not legally binding. Just google "bad faith legal definition" and you'll see it plenty well defines you.

The only reason I haven't taken swift and decisive action against you, HW, or Sky, is because I've said time and time again that you were Roman infiltrators, not Spider Cult ones, as such, I think it's up to Rome to decide how best to respond to your blatant acts of treason.

That said, the recent revelation that some of you might have once been Roman and now aren't thanks to KoD's shenanigans might change my view on some of that. Someone who was once Roman but had their faction changed might be able to make an argument towards being a "member", but certainly not someone who was posing as a Roman in order to spy on them.

Of course, I can tell already that the only reason you even asked this rhetorical question is to maneuver me into a corner in which I have to admit you are free to reveal details about the Spider Cult that you may have learned through this debacle because, as a non-member, you are allegedly not bound by term #4.a, but that's a stupid stance to take because you already stabbed me (and everyone else in that Coalition) in the back, so why should you care about whether or not you're allowed under my definition to do so even more?The winners will be the players who have achieved entry to Zenon's Tea Party.

Oh well, zinger just broke point 2 of the coalition, as the head successor of rag as declared by her in thread d1, I now want to ask my fellow members of rag alliance counsel on whenever our pact still stand, given that zinger solemnly promised in thread to something that breaks it.

Oh well, zinger just broke point 2 of the coalition, as the head successor of rag as declared by her in thread d1, I now want to ask my fellow members of rag alliance counsel on whenever our pact still stand, given that zinger solemnly promised in thread to something that breaks it.

Let me predict where this is going? Zinger will repudiate you. His grounds will be that he didn't disadvantage any remaining member compared to a non-member, since Abigail and her chosen two are not having their wins promoted by Zinger.

This will then get really, really heated if it continues

You just agreed to not cult/kill/harm a second faction alongside the spider cult, that basically shoots either your or the romans chance of winning to 0.

The real question here is not whether Zinger is breaching (2), but whether Zinger is contributing to another member's lynch without that member's consent. Flipping Neon onto HW is not exactly good for HW's survival.

Before I agree to this, who are the two people? I think it's fair I know before I make this deal.

I thought you might rather that be a secret amongst us. Neither is KoD though.

If you truly wish for it to be public I will exclaim it.

Actually, Neon, you can tell me who they are privately tonight so that they remain unknown to everyone else. I accept your deal.

In return for a decree guaranteeing my invite to the tea party, I, Zinger2099, pinky promise, under the oath of my No Lie Policy, to not try to directly or indirectly cult, kill, or harm Neon Abigail, plus two other players of her choosing, under the binding proviso that KingofDominaria not be named as one of those two people.

Ball's in your court, Neon.

Neon is not a member of any faction. Neon's continued survival doesn't impede the wins of anyone.

As for Neon's 2 chosen mates... I presume she will choose Monster as one of them, who has claimed to not be a member of a faction either (and Neon seems to have confirmed her claims). That leaves one person who may get in our way that I personally can't do **** about (but that doesn't rule out the other members of the Coalition). This is a small, and acceptable price to pay in order to secure 33% of our Coalitions win guaranteed, allowing us to spend the remainder of our efforts on the other 66%.

I know the terms well. I live by them. I stared KoD's infinite rage dead in the face, and while you were making backroom deals with the devil, I was refusing to break on our alliance in front of him. I know my place and to whom my loyalties lie. Do you? You've left me out to dry all Day. You are the ones in violation of our terms, not me.

my fellow members of rag alliance counsel

GGs everyone.



Neon, thank you.

Always a pleasure. I enjoy hanging out with you ever since SMM when you trolled me relentlessly lol